Skip to content

NeoDio

13468911

Comments

  • 敬請Marvel兄以中文回答
  • Can any bros share the difference in the performance between the n22 one box and the cdp/cdt combo
  • 火四郎兄,「絕對創意」的確很強!亦都很夾neodio.這兩天用上了它的數碼線和電源,它們在一班線的地位是無可置疑的。它們給予我一個很深刻而統一的感覺就是輪廓很鮮明!訊變很快而完整!音色平均,不濃不淡。空間和現場感也是我用過的所有數碼線之上!電源線幸好還有泰絲可與它平排!相信泰絲高電流仍高踞一班中的一班!我暫時忍忍手!遲些有機會一定會用!況且我深信歐珍圖很快便有新招,保留小許彈藥也不失為過。

    請與「肥仔基」聯絡,我很歡迎你們來我寒舍指教指教。

    Keith,
    相信你也心中有數「分體」和「合併」的分別應有多少,在neodio上,我雖然未能同場ab比較過,但用上了「分體」也有兩個多月,我深信這兩件名器內的高超設計概念絕對不能完全收藏於一個機箱內!就是火牛供電的寧靜度我相信也大大不同。
  • Marvel兄, 原本想趁假期來拜候你, 但大多兄弟今天要上街示威, 所以最後也冇找肥仔基安排.

    我地聽的音樂請唔好見怪因大部份是流行曲和粵劇等, 我地是快人快語的一類, 有話直說, 不懂修飾. 我們也有心離開是非之地. 我覺得這個社區好有文化可惜我地讀書少,英文水皮. 我知道那個叫Zanden先生好有料到但看唔明佢講乜.

    希望你能接受我們.
  • 我個老死麥沙展聽完"絕對創意"素碼線後, 立即放了最新Siltech Golden Eagle . 原全冇得揪. 就算是牌子死硬派也投降, 自問為何名器和表現唔成正比例.
  • 火兄,

    音樂沒有階級觀念. 流行曲也有藝術性, 聽古典也並不代表高級.
    你懂欣賞NeoDio, 而我亦擁有. 我是教英文, 那又如何.

    Mr.Zanden的英文寫作能力是這裡最好的一個, 好有他的風格. Marvel兄的英文也很清析, 但個人風格較淺. Uncle Raymond經常有文法錯誤, 但深度夠, 結論也清楚. Alecy的英文字庫是最多的一個, 風格以隱喻為主.

    Welcome
  • 火四郎兄,英語老師說得對,有冇學識和有冇「品」,可以完全無關係。只要大家保持客觀,坦誠地分享意見,儘量從音樂和音響方面岀發而不是只靠價位高低而妄定器材之優劣。更甚者盲目崇拜用上超貴器材為大師。我尊重的是精益求精的態度,器材幾貴都只不過一千幾百,兩個的士牌都買不到。歡迎多一些交流,到你處拜會一下如何?
  • 絕對創意的電源保證不會令你失望,放在neodio transport上音樂群組的焦點很銳利!就連大提琴奏鳴曲後面伴奏的鋼琴輪廓也份外鮮明和有跳脫感!
  • Marvel兄, 你果然鐘意玩線. 麥沙展和我班小巴司機昨晚不停比較電源線, 其中一條是在新界區受歡迎的"第三舞台大哥ZAP電源"要成四萬多元, 初聴十分流暢, 中高音悅耳, 但中低冇彈跳力, 十分斯文. 中音幾透明冇沙石, 但中低衝擊力節奏感太柔, 是走悅耳型路線.

    泰斯高電流是好多班以上的東西, 昨晚的比賽令我更覺得它抵買. 笫三舞台線主現放32k, 有興趣請找肥仔基. 
  • 火四郎兄,有機會帶條 「第三階段」和絕對創意比較一下,我相信結果會很有參考價值。尤其是很多電源線都只因技術未能突破「頭痛醫頭,腳痛醫腳」的毛病。顧得搞靚個高中音,低頻又欠缺了控制和力感,搞到低頻能量和速度後,中高以上又粗又硬。有些更加放棄一邊,潛心苦練把另外一邊推至高峯,結果就好像有了自己的簽名聲。好與不好就睇所謂「夾唔夾」套機。真正中性和高班的線係要做到德國水晶玻璃的透明度。個樣靚唔靚千祈唔好賴塊鏡。
  • Marvel兄

    「第三階段」應該拿不到過來你處比較, 因為它剛剛接受了最終審判. 分別在前級K10, dCS大哥5件頭CD解碼和Audio Note 英國的平價Ongaku 211再比賽, 結果是一致, 聲音太軟, 尤其在功放個位尤為明顯. 水雷輝認為好似詎以前條Siltech G5 ruby hill, 不過是高清版本. 是一條好線, 但要去到四萬個關口, 再遇上奇兵就有些腳軟.

    線主再割價致28k但要一對買, 一條32k, 這個價位應該ok. 線主親口承認死得好轟烈, 明早已找了替更跑青衣.
  • I shall be watchful of my own grammatical mistakes from now on.

    Allow me to say some words about power cord and cables in general. What Marvel said is very "true" - don't blame the mirror. But how do we know what constitutes a mirror? There is no definitive answer but I can shed some light of my own experiences.

    1. Avoid choosing conductors mixing two or more types of metal because (1) it maybe a tactic to hide the purity of the primary conductor (2) it is difficult to achieve a balanced tonality by using one single conductor

    2. When one conductor is mixed with another one, say silver plated copper - the high frequency travels faster on the skin of the outer conductor. Such sound characteristic generally works for tube components that lacks transient resolution of the solid state. When I was using Wavac 833, my system was stuffed with Nordost cabes.

    3. Ultimately, the effectiveness of power cables is extremely system dependent. It may or may not work in some system even though it is widely complimented by certain groups.

    4. Simple comparisons without adjusting speaker positions do not render any definitive conclusions. This approach only tells the differences of sonic character.

    If I were asked to choose the best power cable that satisfy the criterions listed, my choice is 泰斯高電流.
  • 我深信普通料子的電源線是不會在Mr.Zanden系統裡出現. 從他今年數篇文章以能清楚看到他進步神速, 評論帶有尖銳性但非刻薄. 我估計他用泰斯在前級.
  • Raymond, totally agree with you that mixing different materials in the conductor would yield not only a different speed of transmission but also create very subtle 'skin effect' thus impurity/noise like ringing sound...I have experienced this some years ago in a famous brand which is renowned of mixing gold with silver in making conductors.
  • Ray,

    Can you elaborate "to hide the purity of the primary conductor"?
Sign In or Register to comment.