I shall be watchful of my own grammatical mistakes from now on.
Allow me to say some words about power cord and cables in general. What Marvel said is very "true" - don't blame the mirror. But how do we know what constitutes a mirror? There is no definitive answer but I can shed some light of my own experiences.
1. Avoid choosing conductors mixing two or more types of metal because (1) it maybe a tactic to hide the purity of the primary conductor (2) it is difficult to achieve a balanced tonality by using one single conductor
2. When one conductor is mixed with another one, say silver plated copper - the high frequency travels faster on the skin of the outer conductor. Such sound characteristic generally works for tube components that lacks transient resolution of the solid state. When I was using Wavac 833, my system was stuffed with Nordost cabes.
3. Ultimately, the effectiveness of power cables is extremely system dependent. It may or may not work in some system even though it is widely complimented by certain groups.
4. Simple comparisons without adjusting speaker positions do not render any definitive conclusions. This approach only tells the differences of sonic character.
If I were asked to choose the best power cable that satisfy the criterions listed, my choice is 泰斯高電流.
Raymond, totally agree with you that mixing different materials in the conductor would yield not only a different speed of transmission but also create very subtle 'skin effect' thus impurity/noise like ringing sound...I have experienced this some years ago in a famous brand which is renowned of mixing gold with silver in making conductors.
Comments
請與「肥仔基」聯絡，我很歡迎你們來我寒舍指教指教。
Keith,
相信你也心中有數「分體」和「合併」的分別應有多少，在neodio上，我雖然未能同場ab比較過，但用上了「分體」也有兩個多月，我深信這兩件名器內的高超設計概念絕對不能完全收藏於一個機箱內！就是火牛供電的寧靜度我相信也大大不同。
我地聽的音樂請唔好見怪因大部份是流行曲和粵劇等, 我地是快人快語的一類, 有話直說, 不懂修飾. 我們也有心離開是非之地. 我覺得這個社區好有文化可惜我地讀書少,英文水皮. 我知道那個叫Zanden先生好有料到但看唔明佢講乜.
希望你能接受我們.
音樂沒有階級觀念. 流行曲也有藝術性, 聽古典也並不代表高級.
你懂欣賞NeoDio, 而我亦擁有. 我是教英文, 那又如何.
Mr.Zanden的英文寫作能力是這裡最好的一個, 好有他的風格. Marvel兄的英文也很清析, 但個人風格較淺. Uncle Raymond經常有文法錯誤, 但深度夠, 結論也清楚. Alecy的英文字庫是最多的一個, 風格以隱喻為主.
Welcome
泰斯高電流是好多班以上的東西, 昨晚的比賽令我更覺得它抵買. 笫三舞台線主現放32k, 有興趣請找肥仔基.
「第三階段」應該拿不到過來你處比較, 因為它剛剛接受了最終審判. 分別在前級K10, dCS大哥5件頭CD解碼和Audio Note 英國的平價Ongaku 211再比賽, 結果是一致, 聲音太軟, 尤其在功放個位尤為明顯. 水雷輝認為好似詎以前條Siltech G5 ruby hill, 不過是高清版本. 是一條好線, 但要去到四萬個關口, 再遇上奇兵就有些腳軟.
線主再割價致28k但要一對買, 一條32k, 這個價位應該ok. 線主親口承認死得好轟烈, 明早已找了替更跑青衣.
Allow me to say some words about power cord and cables in general. What Marvel said is very "true" - don't blame the mirror. But how do we know what constitutes a mirror? There is no definitive answer but I can shed some light of my own experiences.
1. Avoid choosing conductors mixing two or more types of metal because (1) it maybe a tactic to hide the purity of the primary conductor (2) it is difficult to achieve a balanced tonality by using one single conductor
2. When one conductor is mixed with another one, say silver plated copper - the high frequency travels faster on the skin of the outer conductor. Such sound characteristic generally works for tube components that lacks transient resolution of the solid state. When I was using Wavac 833, my system was stuffed with Nordost cabes.
3. Ultimately, the effectiveness of power cables is extremely system dependent. It may or may not work in some system even though it is widely complimented by certain groups.
4. Simple comparisons without adjusting speaker positions do not render any definitive conclusions. This approach only tells the differences of sonic character.
If I were asked to choose the best power cable that satisfy the criterions listed, my choice is 泰斯高電流.
Can you elaborate "to hide the purity of the primary conductor"?